Carter Page/FBI (TT)

Explosiv rapport om Trump i fokus – delvis ”trovärdig”

Den så kallade Steelerapporten är återigen i hetluften i den amerikanska politiken. Demokratiska partiet finansierade delar av den omstridda rapporten och enligt kritiska konservativa röster har den använts olämpligt för att motivera övervakningen av Donald Trumps ex-rådgivare Carter Page.

Men de dokument som offentliggjorts i helgen och som visar FBI:s domstolsansökan om att få övervaka Page underminerar republikanska kritikers argument om en partipolitisk polisbyrå, skriver AP.

Förvisso är det sant att Steelerapporten delvis legat till grund för FBI:s ansökan – men byrån redogjorde utförligt för eventuella bakomliggande intressen. Åtminstone delar av rapporten bedömdes trots det som ”trovärdig”. Fyra domare, utnämnda av tre republikanska presidenter, tog avgörande beslut utifrån underlaget, skriver flera medier.

bakgrund
 
Steelerapporten
Wikipedia (en)
The Trump–Russia dossier, also known as the Steele dossier, is a private intelligence report comprising 17 memos that were written from June to December 2016 by Christopher Steele, a former head of the Russia Desk for British intelligence (MI6). The resulting dossier contains allegations of misconduct and conspiracy between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Government of Russia during the 2016 election cycle, with campaign members and Russian operatives allegedly colluding to interfere in the election to benefit Trump. It also alleged that Russia sought to damage Hillary Clinton's candidacy, including sharing negative information about Clinton with the Trump campaign. The dossier was published in full by BuzzFeed on January 10, 2017. Several mainstream media outlets criticized BuzzFeed's decision to release it without first verifying its allegations.Fusion GPS, a private investigative firm, provided political opposition research against Trump in two distinct phases, with completely separate funders. Fusion GPS was first contracted by a conservative political website, The Washington Free Beacon, and Steele was not involved in that research. When Trump became the presumptive Republican Party presidential nominee on May 3, 2016, The Free Beacon stopped their backing. Separately, in April 2016, attorney Marc Elias hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump on behalf of Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele to research and compile the dossier. Steele was hired without knowing, or ever having direct contact with, his ultimate clients, and his only instructions were to seek answers to this basic question: "Why did Mr. Trump repeatedly seek to do deals in a notoriously corrupt police state that most serious investors shun?" Senior Clinton campaign officials were reportedly unaware that Fusion GPS had subcontracted with Steele, and Steele was not told the Clinton campaign was the ultimate recipient of his research. Following Trump's election as president, funding from Clinton and the DNC ceased, but Steele continued his research, and was reportedly paid directly by Glenn R. Simpson, a co-founder of Fusion GPS. The completed dossier was then handed to British and American intelligence services. Weeks before the 2016 election, on the basis of Steele's reputation working on Russia-related matters for nearly 20 years, the FBI reached an agreement to pay Steele to continue his work, but the agreement was later terminated as information about the dossier became public.The media, the intelligence community, and most experts have treated the dossier with caution, due to its unverified assertions, while Trump himself denounced the report as "fake news". However, the intelligence community does take the allegations seriously and investigates them. For example, as of May 2018, former career intelligence officer James Clapper believed that "more and more" of the dossier has been validated over time.Some of the dossier's allegations have been corroborated, while others remain unverified or may require access to classified information for verification. In February 2017, some details related to conversations "solely between foreign nationals" were independently verified. Some of those individuals were known to be "heavily involved" in efforts to damage Clinton and help Trump. The conversations "took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier", giving US intelligence and law enforcement "greater confidence" in the credibility of parts of the dossier.
Omni är politiskt obundna och oberoende. Vi strävar efter att ge fler perspektiv på nyheterna. Har du frågor eller synpunkter kring vår rapportering? Kontakta redaktionen