Hem
(Eric Gay / TT / NTB Scanpix)

Forskare: Stora skillnader i hur globaliseringen slår

Tvärtemot den entydiga bild som ofta målas av hur globalisering och digitalisering påverkar medelklassen och inkomstklyftorna världen över visar tillgänglig data på helt olika utfall i några av världens rikaste länder. Det argumenterar Oxfordforskaren Brian Nolan för i en uppsats på tankesmedjan CEPR:s debattblogg Vox.

”USA:s toxiska kombination av ihållande ökningar av ojämlikheten och långvarig lönestagnation är ett undantag”, skriver han.

Verklighetsbeskrivningen utgår ofta i stor utsträckning från amerikanska förhållanden, enligt honom. Där har ojämlikheten årligen har ökat i en någorlunda hög takt samtidigt som hushållens inkomster haft en svag utveckling. Det skiljer sig till exempel från Sverige där ojämlikheten har ökat betydligt snabbare – men där löneutvecklingen varit förhållandevis stark.

Därför är det viktigt att se till villkoren i de enskilda länderna, skriver Nolan.

”Dagens omfattande ojämlikhet och stagnation ger oss ett bra tillfälle att tänka över hur vi skapar tillväxt och välstånd. Men USA:s erfarenheter borde inte ha ett dominerande genomslag i jakten på på förklaringar och effektiva lösningar.”

bakgrund
 
Gini coefficient
Wikipedia (en)
In economics, the Gini coefficient ( JEE-nee; sometimes expressed as a Gini ratio or a normalized Gini index) is a measure of statistical dispersion intended to represent the income or wealth distribution of a nation's residents, and is the most commonly used measurement of inequality. It was developed by the Italian statistician and sociologist Corrado Gini and published in his 1912 paper Variability and Mutability (Italian: Variabilità e mutabilità).The Gini coefficient measures the inequality among values of a frequency distribution (for example, levels of income). A Gini coefficient of zero expresses perfect equality, where all values are the same (for example, where everyone has the same income). A Gini coefficient of 1 (or 100%) expresses maximal inequality among values (e.g., for a large number of people, where only one person has all the income or consumption, and all others have none, the Gini coefficient will be very nearly one). However, a value greater than one may occur if some persons represent negative contribution to the total (for example, having negative income or wealth). For larger groups, values close to or above 1 are very unlikely in practice. Given the normalization of both the cumulative population and the cumulative share of income used to calculate the Gini coefficient, the measure is not overly sensitive to the specifics of the income distribution, but rather only on how incomes vary relative to the other members of a population. The exception to this is in the redistribution of wealth resulting in a minimum income for all people. When the population is sorted, if their income distribution were to approximate a well-known function, then some representative values could be calculated. The Gini coefficient was proposed by Gini as a measure of inequality of income or wealth. For OECD countries, in the late 20th century, considering the effect of taxes and transfer payments, the income Gini coefficient ranged between 0.24 and 0.49, with Slovenia being the lowest and Chile the highest. African countries had the highest pre-tax Gini coefficients in 2008–2009, with South Africa the world's highest, variously estimated to be 0.63 to 0.7, although this figure drops to 0.52 after social assistance is taken into account, and drops again to 0.47 after taxation. The global income Gini coefficient in 2005 has been estimated to be between 0.61 and 0.68 by various sources.There are some issues in interpreting a Gini coefficient. The same value may result from many different distribution curves. The demographic structure should be taken into account. Countries with an aging population, or with a baby boom, experience an increasing pre-tax Gini coefficient even if real income distribution for working adults remains constant. Scholars have devised over a dozen variants of the Gini coefficient.

Debattören

Brian Nolan, professor i socialpolitik vid universitetet i Oxford.

Omni är politiskt obundna och oberoende. Vi strävar efter att ge fler perspektiv på nyheterna. Har du frågor eller synpunkter kring vår rapportering? Kontakta redaktionen