Nyamko Sabuni/Arkivbild (Henrik Montgomery/TT / TT NYHETSBYRÅN)

L: Utan koldioxidlagring nås inte 1,5-graders målet

Sverige skulle kunna bli världsledande på infångning och lagring av koldioxid, så kallad CCS-teknik, om politikerna väljer att satsa på det. Det skriver Liberalernas Nyamko Sabuni och Helena Gellerman i en debattartikel i SvD. De konstaterar att regeringens passivitet i frågan är en anledning till att byta regering.

”Budskapet har varit klart: utan storskalig användning av koldioxidlagring har världen inte en chans att klara 1,5-graders målet”, skriver debattörerna.

Sabuni och Gellerman menar att argumentet att CCS-teknik skulle vara ett sätt att undvika satsningar på förnybar energi inte håller, utan att båda behövs.

Om debattörerna

Nyamko Sabuni (L)
partiledare
Helena Gellerman (L)
klimatpolitisk talesperson

bakgrund
 
Geologisk lagring av koldioxid
Wikipedia (en)
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) or carbon capture and sequestration is the process of capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) before it enters the atmosphere, transporting it, and storing it (carbon sequestration) for centuries or millennia. Usually the CO2 is captured from large point sources, such as a chemical plant or biomass power plant, and then stored in an underground geological formation. The aim is to prevent the release of CO2 from heavy industry with the intent of mitigating the effects of climate change. Although CO2 has been injected into geological formations for several decades for various purposes, including enhanced oil recovery, the long-term storage of CO2 is a relatively new concept. Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) and CCS are sometimes discussed collectively as carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration (CCUS). This is because CCS is a relatively expensive process yielding a product with an intrinsic low value (i.e. CO2). Hence, carbon capture makes economically more sense when being combined with a utilization process where the cheap CO2 can be used to produce high-value chemicals to offset the high costs of capture operations. CO2 can be captured directly from an industrial source, such as a cement kiln, using a variety of technologies; including absorption, adsorption, chemical looping, membrane gas separation or gas hydration. As of 2020, about one thousandth of global CO2 emissions are captured by CCS. Most projects are industrial.Storage of the CO2 is envisaged either in deep geological formations, or in the form of mineral carbonates. Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage (PyCCS) is also being researched. Geological formations are currently considered the most promising sequestration sites. The US National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) reported that North America has enough storage capacity for more than 900 years worth of CO2 at current production rates. A general problem is that long-term predictions about submarine or underground storage security are very difficult and uncertain, and there is still the risk that some CO2 might leak into the atmosphere.Despite carbon capture increasingly appearing in policymakers' proposals to address climate change, existing CCS technologies have significant shortcomings that limit their ability to reduce or negate carbon emissions; current CCS processes are usually less economical than renewable sources of energy and most remain unproven at scale. Opponents also point out that many CCS projects have failed to deliver on promised emissions reductions. One of the most well-known failures is the FutureGen program, partnerships between the US federal government and coal energy production companies which were intended to demonstrate ″clean coal″, but never succeeded in producing any carbon-free electricity from coal.
Omni är politiskt obundna och oberoende. Vi strävar efter att ge fler perspektiv på nyheterna. Har du frågor eller synpunkter kring vår rapportering? Kontakta redaktionen